1
|
- Presented By: Tyler Waldrop
|
2
|
- Propulsion – Liquid VS Solid
- Flight Controls
- Power Generation
- Communication
- Life Support
- Launch and Orbit
- Re-Entry
- U.S. Space Flight Disasters
- Why?
- Q&A
|
3
|
- Propulsion – Liquid Fuel vs. Solid fuel.
|
4
|
- Liquid Fuel is by far safer and can be switched off and on at will.
Liquid fuel engines can also be fully throttled by controlling the
amount of liquid fuel, oxidizer and pressure in the reaction chamber.
- A scenario where liquid fuel is advantage over solid fuel is for a
rocket flight or trajectory requiring multiple burns during the course
of launch. Liquid fuel is ideal for dealing with what’s called Max-Q.
- A disadvantage of liquid fuel is the refrigeration and time/complexity
required to load and pressurize such volatile and dangerous fuels into a
spacecraft prior to launch.
|
5
|
- Solid fuel engines (SRB’s in the shuttle program) are as the name
suggests, a solid “dry” fuel. Two were used on each shuttle launch.
- A scenario where a solid fuel can be an advantage is when you might need
to launch with no prior preparation. For example, nuclear missiles ready
to launch on command inside a silo.
- A downside is that solid fuel can not easily be extinguished or
relighted. Only recently has this been accomplished with some varied
success. Solid fuel also can not be throttled. However, limited steering
is possible.
|
6
|
- Below is a diagram of a very simplistic view of the inner workings of a
liquid fuel rocket engine.
- As you can see, is consists of two larger tanks, a pump system, a
combustion chamber, a throat and exhaust nozzle.
- A common fuel is RP-1 (Kerosene similar to Jet Fuel). A common oxidizer -
liquid Oxygen (LOX).
|
7
|
- To the right is a very simplistic diagram for a solid fuel motor.
- Ignition is usually a series of pyro explosions.
- O-Rings separate each section of the engine.
- Once ignited, conventional solid rocket engines can not be turned off or
re-ignited.
- Solid propellant in the Shuttle SRB’s was a mix of ammonium perchlorate (oxidizer, 69.6%
by weight), aluminum (fuel, 16%), iron oxide (a catalyst, 0.4%).
|
8
|
- A very common misconception is that rocket engines need an atmosphere to
create thrust/acceleration (forward movement).
- However, this is not how rocket engines (solid or liquid) operate.
- Thrust is created using Netwon’s 3rd law of motion: “When one
body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously
exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first
body.”
- In the case of a rocket engine, it’s the expelled, expanding, hot gases
exiting from the nozzle at high velocity, that pushes against and opposite
the rocket body, that creates the acceleration forces.
|
9
|
- The three critical flight dynamic parameters are the angles of rotation
in three dimensions about the vehicle's center of mass, known as roll, pitch
and yaw.
- While in a gaseous atmosphere, the most common orientation controls
comes in the form of control surfaces like control fins, elevators,
rudders, ailerons and flaps.
- Rockets also use complex and sensitive Gyros, gimbaling systems, thrust
vectoring (like on the F-22 Raptor built at Lockheed), reactionary
control wheels, Reactionary Control Thrusters and other devices for
control outside the presence of an atmosphere to operate in the complete
vacuum of space.
|
10
|
|
11
|
- The ISS uses a mix between a GYRO and
Reactionary Control Wheels pictured in the last slide called a
“Control Moment Gyroscope” (CMG).
- The main difference between
Reactionary Control Wheels and a CMG is that the CMG tilts its
spin Axis to induce torque which is far more efficient. Whereas a
Reaction Wheel would require megawatts of power to induce the same
torque, a CMG can achieve this for only a few hundred watts of power.
|
12
|
- Spacecraft primarily use solar cells or fuel cells to generate
electricity
- Solar cells (also called a photovoltaic cells) use light from the sun
converted to electricity by the photovoltaic effect.
|
13
|
- Fuel Cells are normally a chemical system as was used on the Apollo
program and Space Shuttle program to provide electrical power.
- The power is generated by the reaction between potassium hydroxide,
water, oxygen and hydrogen. These cells are similar to the hybrid
electric cars that are available on the market now.
|
14
|
- Another type of power generation used on long distance and duration
spaceflights like probes and satellites is a “RTG” (Radioisotope
thermoelectric generator).
|
15
|
|
16
|
- There are a number of solutions for Near Earth communications including
Laser and Radio wave communications.
- Recent innovations have made laser communications reliable. LADEE (a
probe that was orbiting the moon until 4/18/14) set a record speed of
622mbs from New Mexico to the lunar orbiting craft. Error-free
transmission was reliable at 20mbs, faster than most residential homes
receive in the U.S.
|
17
|
- For Deep Space Communications NASA uses both the TDRS satellites as well
as Earth based Antennas pictured below for communications with distant
spacecraft and rovers.
- The below picture is a 70m antenna in Goldstone, Cali. This is one of
many antennas that communicate with the Voyager probes and the Mar’s
spacecraft and Rovers.
- A common system at Mars is to relay signals from Goldstone and then to
MRO/MTO and then its relayed to the Rovers.
|
18
|
- Life support, or as NASA refers to it “Enviromental Control”, is a group
of devices that allow a human to survive in space.
- These systems include: food, water, oxygen, carbon dioxide removal,
waste management systems and thermal temperature control to name a few.
- Other systems may include radiation and micro-meteorite protection
elements as well.
- All water is re-used in spaceflight, consider that if you ever want to
travel in space.
- The best defense to radiation is not lead in space, but rather, normal
h2o filled walls. Radiation sources are primarily high-energy particles
from the Sun.
|
19
|
- Any questions or comments?
|
20
|
|
21
|
- What exactly is weightlessness and what does it have to do with being in
“Orbit”?
- Lets start by using a thought experiment originally conceived by Newton,
which explains both points clearly. Netwon Cannon Example
- You can think of it as a continual freefall…what actually keeps objects
in orbit is that they are going so fast that they keep falling off the
edge of the horizon before it can reach it….this happens perpetually.
|
22
|
- Following the cannon analogy, lets look at a typical shuttle launch from
pad to orbit, to re-enty and finally landing.
- I will explain each step below :
|
23
|
- Why do modern rockets have multiple launch stages that separate instead
of just one stage?
- Answer: To increase the thrust to weight ratio. Thereby increasing the
rate of acceleration, and therefore lowering the overall weight and size
of the original rocket.
- If the Apollo-Saturn V rocket did not have all the separate stages, it
would have been close to 2 or 3 times as tall and massive and harder to
control.
|
24
|
- Below are different types of orbits that are used to support a wide
variety of applications/mission types ranging from science to
surveillance.
|
25
|
- Prograde Burn – A prograde burn is when you apply thrust in the
direction of the forward momentum of the spacecraft and accelerating in
relation to the orbiting body. This in return will raise your orbit.
- Retrograde burn – Same as prograde but the exact opposite by thrusting
in reverse of the momentum and decelerating. This is how a spacecraft
purposely re-enters Earth’s atmosphere as will be explained shortly.
- Apoapsis (AP) – The highest altitude of an orbit around another larger
gravitational body.
- Periapsis (PE) – The lowest altitude of an orbit around another larger
gravitational body.
|
26
|
|
27
|
- Re-entry is perhaps the most dangerous portion of spaceflight. You
re-enter the atmosphere at close to 17,000 mph and travel through super-heated
charged plasma as your craft creates friction with atmospheric gases
that easily exceed 1200 degrees Fahrenheit.
- In a planned re-entry, a craft will perform a retrograde burn in the
opposite direction of its momentum until its periapsis is low enough to
re-enter the Earth’s atmosphere where friction will continue to slow the
craft.
|
28
|
- The most common type of re-entry protection is a thermal protection
system (TPS) of some kind, but there is also a new inflatable re-entry
system in development.
- The most common is the “Ablative” type heat shield. It works by creating
a protective layer from re-entry friction plasma by burning materials in
the heat shield to create a gaseous boundary layer. This is called
blockage.
- Most Ablative heat shields are made mostly from carbon-phenolic which
chars, melts and sublimes at high friction within the Atmosphere.
|
29
|
- The space shuttles used a system called thermal soak. It consisted of
multiple shield types, but the best known is the first use of tiles,
which is a trademark of the shuttle program.
- Without a TPS, the shuttle’s aluminum skin would fail at about 347 °F.
- The most common tile on the Shuttle’s was High-temperature reusable
surface insulation (HRSI) pictured below.
|
30
|
- A new technology being tested and possibly being used on future probes
and manned spacecraft will be the inflatable heat shield.
- The shield is vacuum packed into a diameter of 15 inches.
|
31
|
- Parachutes vs Runway landing – Each have their own benefits:
- - Parachutes have the upside of
being very simplistic and low weight in design and are typically well
tested. An issue with parachutes is they can only carry so much weight
- - A Runway landing, like the space shuttle used, allows for a much safer
and controlled final landing phase, but also makes it more complex and
requires much heavier systems like the hydraulics and landing equipment
|
32
|
- In the hasty pace to put a Man on the moon before the Russians, NASA was
making too many shortcuts and throwing relative caution to the wind.
- At 6:30pm on Jan 27, 1967 a fire broke out in the capsule and
asphyxiated all 3 crew members during a launch rehearsal while still on
the pad.
- A later investigation determined that a 100% oxygen cabin environment,
mixed with faulty wiring and a cabin full of flammable material was at
fault.
- To the left is a picture of the Apollo 1 disaster aftermath.
|
33
|
- The challenger disaster was another case of NASA’s over confidence and
impatience in their Shuttle program.
- The SRB engineers had warned their management they could not guarantee
proper O-Ring sealing in these extreme cold temperatures. This was later
overturned by SRB management and NASA was given a go to launch anyways.
Pad Temperature was 29 °F and was 18°F overnight.
|
34
|
- Columbia was an unforeseen complication from an overconfident shuttle
program once again. During launch, engineers had spotted foam (falling
from the external fuel tank insulation) striking the shuttle wing.
Management reviewed the launch video and determined the strike was not
significant enough to be of concern to the crews safety. NASA was WRONG.
|
35
|
- Technological Spin-offs: Drug research, fluid dynamics studies, much
more efficient power generation and life support systems have had to be
designed, which save power, are more efficient and over time much
cheaper than current systems on earth.
- Human inspiration: To remain stagnant, is to admit the utter defeat of
all mankind. The Apollo era’s mission to put a man on the moon united
all of the Earth, These space programs also inspire the younger
generation to pursue science careers that can spin-off to create new
discoveries and technologies bettering all mankind.
- The Gains are worth the Risks!!!
- For example, next time you use Google Maps on your phone to get
somewhere, you can thank our Space Program and the D.O.D.
- Or, the metal beams in this building we’re in is most likely coated in
fire retardant material developed to protect capsules during re-entry.
|
36
|
|